A SYSTEMIC APPROACH TO IMPROVING INNOVATIVENESS IN HIGHER EDUCATION

Dejana Zlatanović, Jelena Nikolić, Zlatko Nedelko

DOI Number
https://doi.org/10.22190/TEME180703001Z
First page
441
Last page
460

Abstract


Innovativeness can be seen as a major competitive advantage in organizations enhancing their effectiveness and enabling the basis for sustainable development. Innovations in higher education systems have an impact on all the systems elements, relationships as well as on the higher order system in which higher education institutions (HEIs) are embedded, ranging from individuals to organizations. A holistic approach to innovativeness in higher education is required in order to improve innovativeness. The paper deals with the issues of improving innovativeness in higher education from the viewpoint of Soft Systems Methodology (SSM), as a relevant interpretive systems approach. The main purpose of this paper is to demonstrate how this systemic approach can help to explore the complex and pluralist nature of management innovativeness in higher education and provide a foundation for improving innovativeness of HEIs. Accordingly, the paper contributes to reveal different perceptions and interpretations of HEIs’ relevant stakeholders on innovativeness, as well as to identify systemically desirable and culturally feasible changes which can improve innovativeness of HEIs. Findings will be useful for HEIs to improve their innovativeness.


Keywords

innovation, improving innovativeness, higher education, Soft Systems Methodology

Full Text:

PDF

References


Al-Husseini, S. and Elbeltagi, I. (2016). Transformational leadership and innovation: a comparison study between Iraq’s public and private higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 41(1), 159–181.doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2014.927848

Babić, V. & Savović, S. (2015). Podsticajni faktori razvoja univerzitetskih spinof poduhvata (Incentive factors for the development of university spin-offs), U Mimović, P. (red). Univerzitetskispinofpoduhvati-organizacioni okvir za realizaciju interdisciplinarnih projekata (University spinoffs - an organizational framework for the realization of interdisciplinary projects) (str.33-67), Kragujevac: Univerzitet uKragujevcu, Ekonomskifakultet.

Baregheh, A., Rowley, J. &Sambrook, S. (2009). Towards a Multidisciplinary Definition of Innovation. Management Decision, 47 (8), 1323–1339.DOI 10.1108/00251740910984578

Bennet, L. M. &Kerr, M. A. (1996). A Systems Approach to the Implementation of Total Quality Management. Total Quality Management, 7 (6), 631-665.DOI 10.1080/09544120100000022

Bennetts, P. D. C., Mills, S. & Wood-Harper, A.T. (2000). Role-play in inquiring systems and information systems development. Systems Research and Behavioral Science,17, 231-242.Doi 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1743(200005/06)17:3<231::AID-SRES317>3.0.CO;2-B

Bouchikhi, H. & Kimberly, R. (2001). It’s difficult to innovate’: The death of the tenured professor and the birth of the knowledge entrepreneur. Human Relations, 54(1), 77-84. doi:10.1177/0018726701541010

Brennan, J., Ryan, S., Ranga, M., Broek, S., Durazzi, N., Kamphuis, B. (2014). Study on innovation in higher education: Final Report Study on Innovation in Higher Education Executive Summary.

Carayannis, E. G., & Rakhmatullin, R. (2014). The Quadruple/Quintuple Innovation Helixes and Smart Specialisation Strategies for Sustainable and Inclusive Growth in Europe and Beyond. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 5(2), 212-239. doi: 10.1007/s13132-014-0185-8

Checkland, P. (1996). Systems Thinking, Systems Practice. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons

Checkland P. (2000). Soft Systems Methodology: A Thirty Year Retrospective.Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 17 (S1), 11-58.

Checkland, P. & Tsouvalis, C. (1997). Reflecting on SSM: The Link Between Root Definitions and Conceptual Models. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 14 (3), 153-168. doi.10.1002/(SICI)1099-1743(199705/06)14:3<153::AID-SRES134>3.0.CO;2-H

Checkland, P., & Poulter, J. (2010). Soft Systems Methodology. In M. Reynolds, & S. Holwell (Eds.), Systems Approaches to Managing Change: A Practical Guide (pp. 191-242). London: Springer

Díaz-Parra, O.; Ruiz-Vanoye, J. A.; Barrera-Cámara, R. A.; Fuentes-Penna, A. & Sandoval, N. (2014). Soft Systems Methodology for the Strategic Planning of the Enterprise Computer Security. International Journal of Combinatorial Optimization Problems and Informatics, 5(1), 2-14.

Ellis, D. (2015). What Discourages Students from Engaging with Innovative Instructional Methods: Creating a Barrier Framework. Innovative Higher Education, 40, 111-125.DOI 10.1007/s10755-014-9304-5

European Commission (2010). Europe 2020 Strategy. available at: http://aei.pitt.edu/47687/1/Europe_2020.pdf

EuropeanUnion. (2006). Innovation Management and the Knowledge-Driven Economy. Brussels: European Union.

Fahey, D. K., Carson, E. R., Cramp, D. G. & Muir Gray, J. A. (2004). Applying Systems Modelling to Public Health. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 21, 635-649.doi.org/10.1002/sres.602

Foss, N. J., & Saebi, T. (2017). Fifteen Years of Research on Business Model Innovation: How Far Have We Come, and Where Should We Go? Journal of Management, 43(1), 200-227. doi: 10.1177/0149206316675927

Garcίa, M. L. & Roblin, P. N. (2008). Innovation, research and professional development in higher education: Learning from our own experience. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24 (1), 104-116.doi:10.1016/j.tate.2007.03.007

Garrison, D.R. & Kanuka, H. (2004). Blended learning: uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. Internet and Higher Education, 7 (2), 95–105.

Gregory, W. J. & Midgley, G. (2000). Planning for disaster: developing a multi-agency counselling service. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 51, 278-290.doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2600912

Hasanefendic, S., Birkholz, J.M., Horta, H. & van der Sijde, P. (2017). Individuals in action: bringing about innovation in higher education. European Journal of Higher Education, 7 (2), 101-119.doi.org/10.1080/21568235.2017.1296367

Jacobs, B. (2004). Using Soft Systems Methodology for Performance Improvement and Organisational Change in the English National Health Service,Journalof Contingenciesand CrisisManagement, 12 (4), 138-149.doi.org/10.1111/j.0966-0879.2004.00444.x

Klomp, L. & Leeuwen, G. (2001). Linking Innovation and Firm Performance: A New Approach. International Journal of the Economics of Business, 8 (3), 343-364. DOI: 10.1080/13571510110079612

Kunnari, I. & Ilomäki, L. (2016). Reframing teachers’ work for educational innovation. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 53 (2), 167–178.doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2014.978351

Lašáková, A., Bajzíková, L. & Dedze, I. (2017). Barriers and drivers of innovation in higher education: Case study-based evidence across ten European universities. International Journal of Educational Development, 55, 69-79.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2017.06.002

Lockett, N., Brown, D. & Sissons, A.(2006). Soft Systems Methodology in IT Project Management: Implementing CRM inSMEs. AMCIS 2006 Proceedings (3722-3732).

Loffler, K., Tschirky, H. &Kijima. K.J. (2009). Embedding Enterprise Science into SSM for Improving Innovation Systems in Technology-Based Companies. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 26, 675-687.doi.org/10.1002/sres.962

Maje, M & Sunjka, B. P. (2014).The Application of Soft Systems Methodology to Supply Chain Risk Management in Small and Medium Enterprises. In (Schutte, C. ed.) Southern African Institute for Industrial Engineering SAIIE26 Proceedings(pp. 317-331).

Nedelko, Z. & Potočan, V. (2013). The role of management innovativeness in modern organizations. Journal of Enterprising Communities: People and Places in the Global Economy, 7 (1), 36-49. doi.org/10.1108/17506201311315590

Neves, L.M.P., Martins, A. G., Antunes, C. H. & Dias, L.C. (2004). Using SSM to rethink the analysis of energy efficiency initiatives. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 55, 968-975. doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601763

OECD (2016). Innovating Education and Educating for Innovation: The Power of Digital Technologies and Skills, OECD Publishing. Paris. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264265097-en

Petrović, S. P. (2013). A Holistic Instrumentarium for Creative Managing the Problem Situations. Teme, 37 (1), 97-116.

Potocan, V., Nedelko, Z., Mulej, M., & Dabic, M. (2016). How University’s Activities Support the Development of Students’ Entrepreneurial Abilities: Case of Slovenia and Croatia. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 1-19. doi: 10.1007/s13132-016-0407-3

Presley, A., Sarkis, J. &Liles, D. (1998). Participative Design Using Soft Systems Methodology, AMCIS Proceedings, 270.

Roffei, M. H. S., Kamarulzaman, Y. & Yusop, D. F. (2016). Innovation culture in higher learnign instituions: A proposed framework. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 219, 401-408.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.05.064

Rogers, E. (2003). Diffusion of Innovations. New York: Free Press.

Serdykov, P. (2017). Innovation in education: what works, what doesn’t, and what to do about it?Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching & Learning, 10(1), 4-33.

Skarzynski, P., & Gibson, R. (2008). Innovation to the core. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Press.

Smith, K. (2000). Innovation as a Systemic Phenomenon: Rethinkingthe Role of Policy. Enterprise & Innovation Management Studies, 1(1), 73- 102.doi.org/10.1080/146324400363536

Tierney, W.G. and Lanford, M. (2016b). Conceptualizing Innovation in Higher Education. In: Paulsen, M. (ed.) Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research (pp.1-32), Vol. 31, Springer

Ulrich, W. (1994). Critical Heuristics of Social Planning – A New Approach to Practcal Philosophy. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons

Yadin, A. (2013). Soft Systems Methodology in an EducationalContext—Enhancing Students Perception and Understanding. International Journal of e-Education, e-Business, e-Management and e-Learning, 3 (5), 351-356.DOI: 10.7763/IJEEEE.2013.V3.25

Valenčić-Zuljan, M. and Vogrinc, J. (eds). (2010). Facilitating Effective Student Learning through Teacher Research and Innovation. Ljubljana: Faculty of Education

Zlatanović, D. (2015). A Holistic Approach to Corporate Social Responsibility as a Prerequisite for Sustainable Development: Empirical Evidence, Economic Annals, 60, 69-94.DOI:10.2298/EKA1507069Z

Zlatanović, D. & Mulej, M. (2015). Soft-systems approaches to knowledge-cum-values management as innovation drivers, Baltic Journal of Management, 10 (4), 497-518. doi.org/10.1108/BJM-01-2015-00

Zlatanović, D. (2016). Kombinovanje metodologija Identifikovanja i testiranja strategisjkih pretpostavki i Organizacione kibernetike u upravlјanju problemskim situacijama u preduzećima (Combining the methodologies of Strategic Assumptions Surfacing and Testing and Organizational Cybernetics in managing the problem situations in enterprises). Ekonomski horizonti, 18(1), 15-32. doi: 10.5937/ekonhor1601015Z,

Zlatanović, D. & Nikolić, J. (2017). Strategic decision making from the viewpoint of systems thinking : the role of values and context. In: Nedelko, Z. & Brzozowski, M. (eds). Exploring the influence of personal values and cultures in the workplace (98-118). Hershey: Business Science Reference




DOI: https://doi.org/10.22190/TEME180703001Z

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Print ISSN: 0353-7919
Online ISSN: 1820-7804