THE FUTURE OF EUROPEAN ARREST WARRANT IN LIGHT OF DECISION THE EUROPEAN COURT OF JUSTICE IN THE CASE ARANYOSI AND CALDARARU

Aleksandar Mićo Bošković, Tomislav Trajković, Gordana Nikolić

DOI Number
https://doi.org/10.22190/TEME190131038B
First page
631
Last page
649

Abstract


For a long time, extradition has been a dominant form of international mutual legal assistance, but in many cases it has proven to be an insufficiently efficient instrument. Having that in mind, on the territory of the European Union, a European arrest warrant has been established as an institute that should contribute to the effectiveness of combating modern crime and facilitate the surrender of persons between member states in order to effectively prevent the escape of suspects or convicted persons. Regarding this, the Article will first give a brief overview of the Council of the European Union Framework Decision, which regulates the European arrest warrant, and will analyze it in order to define the strengths and weaknesses of the task itself. The subject of research in this article is primarily devoted to the analysis of the judgment of the European Court of Justice in the “Aranyosi and Caldararu” case. With this verdict, the European Court of Justice, derogates some of the key principles that order is based on and special attention is devoted to the devaluation of the principles of mutual trust and the principles of mutual recognition of judicial decisions among EU states, which the Council of the European Union considers as the cornerstone of judicial cooperation.


Keywords

Framework Decision 2002/584 / JHA, European arrest warrant, principle of mutual recognition of court decisions, principle of mutual trust, protection of basic human rights.

Full Text:

PDF (Cрпски)

References


Anagnostaras, G. (2016). Mutual confidence is not blind trust! Fundamental rights protection and the execution of the European arrest warrant: Aranyosi and Caldararu. Common Market Law Review 53(6), 1675–1704.

Бановић, Б. (2010). Европски налог за хапшење (European Arrest Warrant). У Зборнику Кривично задонодавство Србије и стандарди Европске уније (Criminal legislation of Serbia and European Union standards). (252-270). Београд: Српско удружење за кривичноправну теорију и праксу.

Бошковић, А. (2015). Радње полиције у претходном кривичном поступку и њихова доказна вредност (Police actions in the preliminary criminal proceedings and their probative value), Београд: Институт за криминолошка и социолошка истраживања.

Bovend’Eerdt, K. (2016). The Joined Cases Aranyosi and Căldăraru: A New Limit to the Mutual Trust Presumption in the Area of Freedom, Security, and Justice? Utrecht Journal of International and European Law 32(83), 112-121. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/ujiel.337

Čule, J., & Hržina, D. (2013). Primjena Europskog uhidbenog naloga u Republici Hrvatskoj – očekivanja i stvarnost (Application of the European Arrest Warrant in Croatia - expectations and reality). Hrvatski ljetopis za kazneno pravo i praksu, 20(2), 715-750.

Đurđević, Z. (2007). Europski sud pravde i legitimitet europskog uhidbenog naloga (The European Court of Justice and the legitimacy of the European arrest Warrant). Hrvatski ljetopis za kazneno pravo i praksu, 14(2), 1021-1028.

Ђурђић, В. (2012). Европски налог за хапшење (European Arrest Warrant). Зборник радова Правног факултета у Новом Саду, 46(1), 21-37.

Gáspár-Szilágyi, S. (2016). Joined Cases Aranyosi and Căldăraru: Converging Human Rights Standards, Mutual Trust and a New Ground for Postponing a European Arrest Warrant. European Journal of Crime, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice, 24(2-3), 197-219.

Hong, M. (2016). Human Dignity, Identity Review of the European Arrest Warrant and the Court of Justice as a Listener in the Dialogue of Courts: Solange-III and Aranyosi: BVerfG 15 December 2015, 2 BvR 2735/14, Solange III, and ECJ (Grand Chamber) 5 April 2016, Joined Cases C-404/15 and C-659/15 PPU, Aranyosi and Căldăraru. European Constitutional Law Review, 12(3), 549-563.

Кесић, Т. (2014). Међународни стандарди поступања полиције у кривичним стварима (International standards for police conduct in criminal matters). Београд: Криминалистичко-полицијска академија.

Кнежевић, С. (2009). Екстрадиција у европском праву (Extradition in European Law). У Зборнику Водич кроз право Европске уније (Guide to European Union law). (202-217). Београд : Службени гласник : Институт за међународну политику и привреду : Правни факултет Универзитета.

Krapac, D. (2014). Okvirna odluka Vijeća (Europske Unije) od 13. VI 2002. o Europskom uhidbenom nalogu (EUN) i postupcima predaje između država članica (2002/584/PUP) (The Framework Decision on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States from 13. VI 2002.). Zbornik Pravnog fakulteta u Zagrebu, 64(5-6), 955-988.

Marguery, T.P. (2016). Rebuttal of Mutual Trust and Mutual Recognition in Criminal Matters: Is ‘Exceptional’ Enough? European Papers, 1(3), 943-963.

Nikač, Ž., Korajlić, N., & Bećirović, M. (2013). Evropski nalog za hapšenje i predaju kao supstitut ekstradicije u EU (European Arrest Warrant as a substitute for extradition in EU). Kriminalističke teme 13(1-2), 75-91.

Primorac, D., Krmek, M., & Pilić, M. (2015). Teorijska i praktična problematika izvršenja europskog uhidbenog naloga bez provjere dvostruke kažnjivosti (Theoretical and practical problems of performance European Arrest Warrant without verification of double punishability). U Zborniku Usklađivanje zakonodavstva sa ACQUIS-EM (Harmonization of legislation with ACQUIS). (105-117). Sarajevo: Centar za društvena istraživanja Internacionalnog Burch univerziteta.

Рисимовић, Р. (2013). Основи који искључују постојање кривичног дела у упоредном праву (Basics that exclude the existence of a criminal offense in comparative law). Београд: Криминалистичко-полицијска академија.

Стојановић, З. (2004). Међународно кривично право (International Criminal Law). Београд: Јустинијан.

Вучковић, Б., & Вучковић, В. (2015). Европски налог за хапшење (European Arrest Warrant). У Зборнику Међународна судска, тужилачка и полицијска сарадња у борби против криминала (International judicial, prosecutorial and police cooperation in the fight against crime). (205-213). Београд: Удружење за међународно кривично право.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.22190/TEME190131038B

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Print ISSN: 0353-7919
Online ISSN: 1820-7804