STEERING URBAN POLICY FOR REACHING DEVELOPMENT AND SOCIAL WELFARE – LESSONS FROM SCANDINAVIA

Snežana Đorđević

DOI Number
https://doi.org/10.22190/TEME190515044D
First page
719
Last page
731

Abstract


This article analyses the way of managing urban policy in Scandinavian countries, as an example for Serbia. By analyzing urban policy as complex activity, because it demands contextual approach, democratic governmental capacities, good management with capacities to tail services according to the needs of citizens in their community, we could understand cities as stimulators of development and creators of welfare. 

This analysis tries to identify how Serbia, as transitional country can learn lessons from Scandinavian countries, to modernize management, democratize political system (decentralization and strengthening local government capacities), as well as to decrease corruption and misuses in public affairs.

In methodological sense this article includes analysis of the system, the way of creation and steering urban policy in Scandinavian countries with affirmation of knowledge (evidence based public policy) and professionalism. Case study of Copenhagen city and experiences from other cities from this region, will procure in view of potential benefits of such an approach. On this basis comparison is made with similar processes in Serbia, which give us possibility to identify necessary corrections in our system.

Some of the results of this paper are better knowledge of Serbian system weaknesses (especially in way of managing cities), loss of benefits which democratic and decentralized society enables, modern management, creation of policies on evidence, and creative searching for solution.

One can conclude that reform changes, which turn out to be impossible for implementation in our society, do not demand great material investments, but demand the changing of values, priorities and model of behavior.

Keywords

urban policy, strategic management, mission and results driven management, sustainable development, citizens participation

Full Text:

PDF

References


Brannstrom, L.,& Yerko, R. (2012). Rethinking the Long-Term Consequences of Growing Up in a Disadvantaged Neighbourhood: Lessons from Sweden. Housing Studies, 27(6), 729–747. doi:10.1080/02673037.2012.714460

Caragliu, A., Del Bo, C., & Nijkamp, P. (2011). Smart Cities in Europe. Journal of Urban Technology, 18(2), 65-82. doi:10.1080/10630732.2011.601117

Čolić, R. (2015). Integrated Urban Development Strategy as an Instrument for Supporting Urban Governance. Serbian Architectural Journal SAJ.7(3), 317-342.

Đorđević, S. (2018). Urban Regeneration Policy - Case Studies from Belgrade, Forum of Foreign Languages, Politology, and International Relations. Danubious University.

Đorđević, S. (2017). Primena principa subsidijariteta u Srbiji (Implementation of Subsidiary Principle in Serbia). Čigoja, Beograd.

Đorđević, S. (2014). Položaj i kapaciteti gradskih i opštinskih menadžera u Srbiji (Position and Capacities of City and Municipality Managers in Serbia). Čigoja, Beograd.

Đorđević, S. (2012). Savremene urbane studije (Contemporary Urban Studies). Čigoja, Beograd.

Fraker, H. (2013). The Hidden Potential of Sustainable Neighborhoods: Lessons From Low-Carbon Communities. Island Press, Washington.

Gehl, J. (2016). Gradovi za ljude (Cities for People), PALGO centar, Inženjerska komora prostornih planera, Beograd.

Hedin, K., Clark E., Lundholm E., & Malmberg, G. (2012). Neoliberalization of Housing in Sweden: Gentrification, Filtering and Social Polarization. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 102 (2), doi:10.1080/00045608.2011.620508.

Jorgensen, G., & Ero, T. (2008). Urban Policy in the Nordic Countries - National Foci and Strategies for Implementation. Taylor and Francis.

Nylund, K. (2014). Conceptions of justice in the planning of the new urban landscape – Recent changes in the comprehensive planning discourse in Malmo. Planning Theory & Practice, 15(1), 41–61. doi:10.1080/14649357.2013.866263.

Reimer, P., Getimis, H.H., & Blotevoger H. (2014). Spatial Planning Systems and Practices in Europe - A Comparative Perspective on Continuity and Changes. Routledge, Akademie fuer Raumforschung und Landesplanung, London and New York.

Sandstrom, U. (2002). Green Infrastructure Planning in Urban Sweden. Planning Practice & Research, 17(4), 373–385, doi:10.1080/02697450216356.

Stojkov, B., Damjanović, D., Križanić, T, & Petrović, M. (2015). Mogućnost unapređenja javnog uvida kod pripreme i donošenja prostornih i urbanističkih planova, (Possibility for upgrading public in-view in preparation and stipulation of spatial and urban plans). PALGO centar, SKGO, Beograd.

Willson, R. (2015). Parking Management for Smart Growth. Island Press, Washington, Covelo, London.

WEB PAGES

www.dw.com/en/oslo-starts-2019-as-europes-eco-capital/a-46786866

https://www.euractiv.com/section/climate-environment/interview/oslo-mayor-heres-how-we-plan-to-become-a-carbon-neutral-city/

www.cphsolutionslab.dk,

www.dac.dk/eng

www.cphsolutionslab.dk

https://www.dw.com/en/oslo-starts-2019-as-europes-eco-capital/a-46786866




DOI: https://doi.org/10.22190/TEME190515044D

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Print ISSN: 0353-7919
Online ISSN: 1820-7804