EGG DONATION: EXPLORING ATTITUDES OF STUDENTS TOWARDS DONATION

Јелена Опсеница Костић, Милица Митровић, Дамјана Панић

DOI Number
https://doi.org/10.22190/TEME191031047O
First page
Last page

Abstract


Conception with donated oocytes represents an important option for overcoming sterility, but brings with it numerous dilemmas, which have been dealt with differently in various European countries. In the Republic of Serbia anonymous oocyte donation is legal, and donors include women from the general population, and women undergoing IVF. This is a new phenomenon in our society, for which the law requires promotion. In order for the campaign to be appropriate, it is necessary to learn about existing attitudes. This research was carried out with the aim of determining the attitudes of students towards egg donation (N = 503; 206 young men, 297 young women). A questionnaire was used, designed based on the scale used by Swedish authors to study the attitudes of potential donors (Skoog-Svanberg, Lampic, Bergh, & Lundkvist, 2003). The obtained results indicate that there are generally positive attitudes towards oocyte donation, but that most respondents are reserved regarding the issue of propagating donors in the media. Most of the respondents are unsure regarding donation from IVF, and when asked about donor anonymity and the right of the child to learn its genetic origin, they showed signs of oscillating and supporting contradictory options. Even though this study was carried out on a student population, it is possible to identify significant guidelines for the start of the promotion of voluntary egg donation in RS, as well as implications for future research.

Keywords

egg cell donation, attitudes towards donation, potential donors, donor promotion, students

Full Text:

PDF

References


Andersen, A. N., Goossens, V., Gianaroli, L., Felberbaum, R., de Mouzon, J., & Nygren, K. G. (2007). Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2003. Results generated from European registers by ESHRE. Human Reproduction 22(6), 1513–1525. doi:10.1093/humrep/dem053

Bayefsky, M. J., DeCherney, A. H., Berkman, B. E. (2016). Compensation for egg donation: a zero-sum game. Fertility and Sterility, 105(5), 1153–1154. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.01.019

Baykal, B., Korkmaz, C., Ceyhan, S.T., Goktolga, U., & Baser, I. (2008). Opinions of infertile Turkish women on gamete donation and gestational surrogacy. Fertility and Sterility, 89(4), 817–822. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.04.022

Blyth, E., & Golding, B. (2008). Egg sharing: a practical and ethical option in IVF? Review of Obstetrics & Gynecology, 3(4), 465–473.

Bracewell-Milnes, T., Saso, S., Bora, S., Ismail, A. M., Al-Memar, M., Hamed, A. H., Abidalla, H., & Thum, M.-Y. (2016). Investigating psychosocial attitudes, motivations and experiences of oocyte donors, recipients and egg sharers: a systematic review. Human Reproduction Update, 22(4), 450–465. doi:10.1093/humupd/dmw006

Ceballo, R., Abbey, A., & Schooler, D. (2010). Perceptions of women’s infertility: what do physicians see? Fertility and Sterility, 93(4), 1066–1073. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.11.019

Chliaoutakis, J. E., Koukouli, S., Papadakaki, M. (2002). Using attitudinal indicators to explain the public’s intention to have recourse to gamete donation and surrogacy. Human Reproduction, 17, 2995–3002. doi: 10.1093/humrep/17.11.2995

Eurostat (2019). Fertility statistics. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Fertility_statistics

ESHRE fact sheets 3 (2017). Egg donation. Посећено 15. марта 2018. године на https://www.eshre.eu/Press-Room/Resources

Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Informing offspring of their conception by gamete or embryo donation: a committee opinion. (2013). Fertility and Sterility, 100(1), 45–49. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.02.028

Freeman, T., Graham, S., Ebtehaj, F., & Richards, M. (2014). Relatedness in Assisted Reproduction. Families, Origins and Identities. Cambridge University Press.

García, D., Vassena, R., Trullenque, M., Rodríguez, A., & Vernaeve, V. (2015). Fertility knowledge and awareness in oocyte donors in Spain. Patient Education and Counseling, 98, 96–101. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2014.10.009

Gezinski, L. B., Karandikar, S., Carter, J., & White, M. (2016). Exploring Motivations, Awareness of Side Effects, and Attitudes among Potential Egg Donors. Health & Social Work, 41(2), 75–83. doi:10.1093/hsw/hlw005

Gnoth, C., Godehardt, E., Frank-Herrmann, P., Friol, K., Tigges, J., & Freundl, G. (2005). Definition and prevalence of subfertility and infertility. Human Reproduction, 20(5), 1144–1147. doi:10.1093/humrep/deh870

Golombok, S. (2015). Modern Families: Parents and Children in New Family Forms. Cambridge University Press.

Isikoglu, M., Senol, Y., Berkkanoglu, M., Ozgur, K., Donmez, L., & Stones-Abbasi, A. (2006). Public opinion regarding oocyte donation in Turkey: fist data from a secular population among the Islamic world. Human Reproduction, 21, 318–323. doi:10.1093/humrep/dei274

Kenney, N. J., & McGowan, M. L. (2010). Looking back: egg donors’ retrospective evaluations of their motivations, expectations, and experiences during their first donation cycle. Fertility and Sterility, 93(2), 455–466. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.09.081

Khalili, M., Isikoglu, M., & Ghasemi, M. (2006). Attitudes of Christians and Muslims to an oocyte donation program in ran. Eubios Journal of Asian and International Bioethics, 16(3), 66–71. Retrieved from https://www.eubios.info/EJAIB52006.pdf

Lee, M. S., Farland, L. V., Missmer, S. A., & Ginsburg, E. S. (2017). Limitations on the compensation of gamete donors: a public opinion survey. Fertility and Sterility, 107(6), 1355–1363.e4. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.03.001

Lester, D., Furnham, A., & Salem, N. (2010). Attitudes toward Egg and Sperm Donation. Psychological Reports, 106(2), 579–580. doi:10.2466/pr0.106.2.579-580

Nargund, G. (2009). Declining birth rate in Developed Countries: A radical policy re-think is required. Facts, Views & Vision in Obstetrich, Gynaecology and Reproductive Health, 1 (3): 191-193.

Pasch, L. A. (2018). New realities for the practice of egg donation: a family-building perspective. Fertility and Sterility, 110(7), 1194–1202. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.08.055

Pavone, V. (2018). 50% of european egg donation happens in Spain. Why? International medical travel journal. Преузето 12.2. 2019. године са https://www.imtj.com/articles/50-european-egg-donation-happens-spain-why/ .

Petz, J. D., Janic, A., Craig, & L. B. (2016). Ethnic and racial differences in the prevalence of infertility: national survey of family growth (NSFG). Fertility and Sterility, 103(6), supp. e8. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.07.030

Platts, S., Bracewell-Milnes, T., Saso, S., Jones, B., Parikh, R., & Thum, M.-Y. (2019). Investigating attitudes towards oocyte donation amongst potential donors and the general population: a systematic review. Human Fertility, 1–13. doi:10.1080/14647273.2019.1602736

Purewal, S., & van den Akker, O.B.A. (2009a). Systematic review of oocyte donation: investigating attitudes, motivations and experiences. Human Reproduction Update, 15(5), 499–515.

Purewal, S., & van den Akker OBA. (2009b). Attitudes and intentions towards volunteer oocyte donation. Reproductive Biomedicine Online, 19(suppl 1), 19–26. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1472-6483(10)60059-4

Rašević, M. (2002). Voljna sterilizacija u Srbiji: nezadovoljena potreba? Stanovništvo, 1(4), 15-33.

Statistical Office of the Republic of Serbia (2019). Announcement – Vital events, 2018. https://publikacije.stat.gov.rs/G2019/Pdf/G20191177.pdf [In Serbian]

Shapiro, D. B. (2018). Payment to egg donors is the best way to ensure supply meets demand. Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 53, 73–84.

Simons, E.G., & Ahuja, K. K. (2005). Egg-sharing: an evidence based solution to donor egg shortages. The Obstetrician & Gynaecologist, 7, 112–116. doi: https://doi.org/10.1576/toag.7.2.112.27069

Skoog-Svanberg, A., Lampic, C., Bergh, T., & Lundkvisk, Ö. (2003а). Public opinion regarding oocyte donation in Sweden. Human Reproduction, 18, 1107–1114. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deg222

Skoog-Svanberg, A. Lampic, C., Bergh, T., & Lundkvisk, Ö. (2003b). Characterization of potential oocyte donors in Sweden. Human Reproduction, 18(10), 2205–2215. doi:10.1093/humrep/deg398

Stanford, J. B. (2013). What is the true prevalence of infertility? Fertility and Sterility, 99(5), 1201–1202. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.12.006

Stevens, J.B., & Hayes, C. (2010). Perceptions regarding oocyte donation in a group of female college students. MCN the American Journal of Maternal Child Nursing, 35, 40–46. doi: 10.1097/01.NMC.0000366809.52208.60.

Stöbel-Richter, Y., Goldschmidt, S., Brähler, E., Weidner, K., & Beutel, M. (2009). Egg donation, surrogate mothering, and cloning: attitudes of men and women in Germany based on a representative survey. Fertility and Sterility, 92(1), 124–130. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.05.015

Straehl, J., Lara, L., Sa, M.F.S., Reis, R.M., & Rosa, E.S.A. (2017) What do infertile women think about oocyte reception, oocyte donation, and child adoption? Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrıcia / Rbgo Gynecology and Obstetrics, 39, 282–287. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1603742

Thaldar D (2020) Egg donors’ motivations, experiences, and opinions: A survey of egg donors in South Africa. PLoS ONE 15(1): e0226603. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal. pone.0226603

Zakon o Biomedicinski potpomognutoj oplodnji - Law on Biomedically Assisted Fertility (2017). Available at: http://www.pravno informacioni sistem.rs/SlGlasnikPortal/eli/rep/sgrs/skupstina/zakon/2017/40/1




DOI: https://doi.org/10.22190/TEME191031047O

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Print ISSN: 0353-7919
Online ISSN: 1820-7804