RELATION BETWEEN “CIVIL” AND “INCLUSIVE” SOCIETY FROM A THEORETICAL PERSPECTIVE

Јована Шкорић

DOI Number
-
First page
695
Last page
708

Abstract


The past few decades offer the evidence of the expansion of civil society organizations arising from the inability of states to, due to political or administrative constraints, cover the whole spectrum of citizens’ needs. In view of this, the paper will elaborate on the main theoretical perspectives of the concepts of “civil” and “inclusive” society, as well as the significance of civil society organizations for the social development, democratic values and an inclusive society.

The introductory part of paper shows a brief overview of the history of the concept of civil society. On the one hand, it will present the main postulates of neo-liberal pluralist paradigm and contextualization of civil society by Jürgen Habermas, Robert Putnam, Francis Fukuyama and Jeffrey Alexander and on the other side we are going to consider Gramsci’s paradigm and its importance in this context. In addition, paper will present the modern conceptualization and possible perspectives of civil society organizations which will be followed by the operationalization of the concept of an inclusive society and the importance of social inclusion in this context. The last and concluding chapter is devoted to the criticism of the civil society (organizations) and challenges faced by CSOs in the social inclusion politics.


Keywords

Civil society, CSOs, inclusive society, social inclusion.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ahmad, R. (2016). Supplementary Role of Civil Society in Governance: An Analysis, International Journal of Arts, Humanities and Management Studies 2 (6), 1-11.

African Development Bank (1999). Cooperation with Civil Society Organization, Policy and Guidelines. Available at: http://www.afdb.org/fileadmin/uploads/afdb/Documents/Policy-Documents/10000024-EN-COOPERATION-WITH-CIVIL-SOCIETY-ORGANIZATIONS-POLICY-AND-GUIDELINES.PDF. Retrieved from: 9.9.2016.

Alexander, J. (1994). The Paradoxes of Civil Society. Social Sciences Research Centre 16, 3-18.

Alexander, J. (2006). The Civil Sphere. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Bourdieu, P. (1986). Forms of Capital. In: J. G. Richardson (ed.), Handbook for Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education. New York: Greenwood, pp. 241–258.

Brown, W. (2006). Neoliberalism, neoconservatism, and de-democratization. Political Theory 34 (6): 690–714.

Brown, D.L. and A. Kalegaonkar (1999). Addressing Civil Society’s Challenges: Support Organizations and Emerging Institutions, IDR Reports 15 (2), 1-17.

Blomberg, F. (2014). The Bright & Dark Sides of Civil Society: Democratic Consolidation and Regime Hybridity in Divided Societies. Frankfurt: Oder.

Carothers, T. (2004). Critical Mission: Essays on Democracy Promotion. Washington DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

Civil Society Initiative (2001). Strategic Alliances – The Role of Civil Society in Health. Available at: http://www.who.int/civilsociety/documents/en/alliances_en.pdf. Retrieved from: 2.01.2017.

Coleman, J. (1988). Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital, The American Journal of Sociology. 94 (1), 95-120.

Chakraborty, L. S. (2016). Gramsci’s Idea of Civic Society, International Journal of Research in Humanities and Social Studies 3 (6), 19-27.

Division for Social Policy and Development (2009). Creating an Inclusive Society: Practitcal Stategies to Promote Social Integration .New York: Habitat.

Fukuyama, F. (2001). Social Capital, Civil Society and Development, Third World Quarterly 22 (2), 7-20.

Gramsci, A. (1971). Selections from the Prison Notebooks of Antonio Gramsci. London: Lawrence & Wishart.

Habermas, J. (1992). Further Reflections on the Public Sphere. In C. Calhoun (ed.) Habermas and the Public Sphere. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 421-461.

Harvey, D. (2005). A Short History of Neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Keane, J. (1988). Democracy and Civil Society. London/New York: Verso.

Koh, H (2000). Complementarity between International Organizations on Human Rights/the Rise of Transnational Networks as the “Third Globalization”, Human rights Law Journal 21 (8), 307-10.

Nuscheler, F. (2003). Civil-Society Actors: A Democratic Corrective for International Organizations? Available at: http://library.fes.de/pdf-files/iez/global/02046.pdf. Retrieved from: 4.12.2016.

Putnam, R. (1993). Making Democracy Work: Civic Tradition in Modern Italy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling Alone. New York: Simon and Schuster Paperbacks.

Salamon, L. M. (1994). The Global Associational Revolution: The Rise of the Third Sector on the World Scene, Foreign Affairs 73, 111-124.

Seligman, J. (1992). The Idea of Civil Society. New York/Toronto: The Free Press.

Seran, A. (2013). Civil Society: A Study of Jurgen Habermas’s Theory of Deliberative Democracy, Communicare Journal of Communication Studies 2 (1), 73-83.

Шкорић, М. и А. Кишјухас (2014). Водич кроз идеологије I [Guide through Ideologies]. Novi Sad: AKO.

Tabbush, C. (2005). Civil Society in United Nations Conferences: a Literature Review. Geneva: UNRISD.

Tok, N. (2003). An Essay on Gramsci's Concept of Civil Society. İktisadi Ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 17 (3- 4), 239-254.

World Economic Forum (2013). The Future Role of Civil Society. Available at: http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_FutureRoleCivilSociety_Report_2013.pdf. Retrieved from: 22.12.2016.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Print ISSN: 0353-7919
Online ISSN: 1820-7804