DISTRIBUTION OF MEANINGS OF THE QUANTIFIER NEKI 'SOME' IN SERBIAN: CORPUS-BASED ANALYSIS

Мирјана Мирић

DOI Number
https://doi.org/10.22190/TEME1803839M
First page
839
Last page
858

Abstract


The paper analyzes the distribution of meanings of the quantifier neki 'some' in over 1500 utterances excerpted from the Serbian electronic corpus of early child language and the Corpus of contemporary Serbian language. The aim is to test the implicit Frequency Assumption of lexicalist approaches to scalar implicatures (SI), claiming that the use of the quantifier some often triggers SI: some = some, but not all. The analysis of proportions of meanings shows high dominance of different types of non-scalar meanings (existential, quantitative, spesumptive, exclamative). In child speech there are no instances of scalar meaning, whereas in the child directed speech they are extremely rare, which overall suggests that one of the possible reasons for the developmental asymmetry might be the low frequency of scalar meaning in the language input. In the written language of adults, a higher percentage of utterances bearing the potential to derive SIs is registered; however, scalar interpretation is strengthened by contextual factors.


Keywords

quantifier neki ('some'), scalar implicatures, Frequency Assumption, distribution of meanings, corpus analysis.

Full Text:

PDF (Cрпски)

References


Корпуси:

Anđelković, D., Ševa, N., & Moskovljević, J. (2001). Srpski elektronski korpus ranog dečjeg govora [Serbian electronic corpus of early child language]. Beograd: Laboratorija za eksperimentalnu psihologiju Filozofskog fakulteta, Katedra za opštu lingvistiku Filološkog fakulteta. Доступно на: http://childes.talkbank.org/access/Slavic/Serbian/SCECL.html

MacWhinney, B. (2000). The CHILDES project (3rd ed.) Volume II: Tools for analyzing talk: The Database. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Korpus savremenog srpskog jezika [Corpus of contemporary Serbian language]. Matematički fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu. Доступно на: http://www.korpus.matf.bg.ac.rs/

Речници:

РМС – (2007). Речник српскога језика [Dictionary of Serbian language]. Нови Сад: Матица српска.

РСАНУ – Речник српскохрватског књижевног и народног језика [Dictionary of Serbo-Croatian literary language and vernacular]. Том XV. Београд: Српска академија наука и уметности.

Мирић, М. (2016). Усвајање скаларних импликатура у српском језику: семантички, прагматички и синтаксички угао [The acquisition of scalar implicatures in Serbian: semantic, pragmatic and syntactic approach]. Докторска дисертација. Филозофски факултет Универзитета у Нишу. Доступно на: https://fedorani.ni.ac.rs/fedora/get/o:1149/bdef:Content/get

Младеновић, Б. Квантификација и егзистенција. Проблеми егзистенцијалне квантификације у српском и енглеском језику [Quantification and existence. Problems of existential quantification in Serbian and English]. Докторска дисертација. Филолошки факултет Универзитета у Београду. Доступно на: http://nardus.mpn.gov.rs/bitstream/handle/123456789/8616/Disertacija.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y

Пипер, П. (1980). О типовима квантификатора у српскохрватском језику [On the types of quantifiers in Serbo-Croatian]. Научни састанак слависта у Вукове дане, 11(2), 93–103.

Пипер, П., Антонић, И., Ружић, В., Танасић, С., Поповић, Љ., & Тошовић, Б. (2005). Синтакса савременог српског језика [Syntax of contemporary Serbian]. Београд: Београдска књига, Институт за српски језик САНУ.

Станојчић, Ж., Поповић, Љ. (2012). Граматика српскога језика [Grammar of Serbian]. Београд: Завод за уџбенике и наставна средства.

Arsenijević, B. (2016). Atypical demonstratives in an articleless language. To appear in Coniglio, M., Schlachter, E., & Veenstra, T. (Еds.), Demonstratives: syntax, semantics and typology. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Barner, D., Brooks, N., & Bale, А. (2011). Accessing the unsaid: The role of scalar alternatives in children’s pragmatic inferences. Cognition, 118(1), 84–93.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2010.10.010

Barner, D., Bachrach, А. (2010). Inference and exact numerical representation in early language development. Cognitive Psychology, 60(1), 40–62.

Barwise, J., Cooper, R. (1981). Generalized Quantifiers and Natural Language. Linguistics and Philosophy, 4, 159–219.

Breheny, R., Katsos, N., & Wiliams, J. (2006). Are generalized scalar implicatures generated by default? An on-line investigation into the role of context in generating pragmatic inferences. Cognition, 100(3), 434–463.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2005.07.003

Chierchia, G., Crain, S., Guasti, M. T., Gualmini, A., & Meroni, L. (2001). The Acquisition of Disjunction: Evidence for a Grammatical View of Scalar Inferences. In: Do, А.H.J, Domínguez, L., & Johansen, A. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 25th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 157–168). Somerville: Cascadilla Press.

Degen, J. (2013). Alternatives in Pragmatic Reasoning. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Rochester, New York. Retrieved from: https://urresearch.rochester.edu/fileDownloadForInstitutionalItem.action?itemId=28156&itemFileId=143071

Etxeberria, U., Giannakidou, A. (2010). Contextual domain restriction, familiarity and

definiteness: A cross-linguistic perspective. In: Recanati, F., Stojanović, I., & Villanueva, N. (Eds.), Context-Dependence, Perspective and Relativity. Mouton de Gruyter.

Franke, M. (2009). Signal to act: Game theory in pragmatics. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Universiteit van Amsterdam.

Geurts, B. (2011). Quantity Implicatures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Guasti, M. T., Chierchia, G., Crain, S., Foppolo, F., Gualmini, A., & Meroni, L. (2005). Why children and adults sometimes (but not always) compute implicatures. Language and Cognitive Processes, 20(5), 667–696.

Heim, I. (1982). The Semantics of Definite and Indefinite Noun Phrases. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Massachusetts at Amherst. Retreived from: http://semarch.linguistics.fas.nyu.edu/Archive/jA2YTJmN/Heim%20Dissertation%20with%20Hyperlinks.pdf

Horn, L. (2004). Implicature. In: Horn, L., & Ward, G. (Eds.), The Handbook of Pragmatics, (pp. 3–28). Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Huang, Y. T., Snedeker, J. (2009). Online interpretation of scalar quantifiers: insight into the semantics-pragmatics interface. Cognitive Psychology, 58(3), 376–415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2008.09.001

Israel, M. (1999). Some and the pragmatics of indefinite construal. In: Proceedings of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 25, (pp.169–182).

Katsos, N. et al. 2016. Cross-linguistic patterns in the acquisition of quantifiers. PNAS 133(33), 9244–9249. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1601341113

Levinson, S. (2000). Presumptive Meanings – The Theory of Generalized Conversational Implicature. The MIT Press.

Milsark, G. (1977). Toward an explanation of certain peculiarities of the existential construction in English. Linguistic Analysis, 3, 1–29.

Mostowski, A. (1957). On a Generalization of Quantifiers. Fundamenta Mathematica, 44, 12–36.

Noveck, I. (2001). When Children are More Logical than Adults: Experimental Investigations of Scalar Implicature. Cognition, 78(2), 165–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(00)00114-1

Papafragou, A., Musolino, J. (2003). Scalar Implicatures: Experiments at the Semantic/Pragmatic Interface. Cognition, 86, 253–282.

Russell, B. (2006). Against Grammatical Computation of Scalar Implicatures. Journal of Semantics, 23, 361–382.

Von Fintel, K. (1994). Restrictions on Quantifier Domains. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts. Retreived from: http://semarch.linguistics.fas.nyu.edu/Archive/jA3N2IwN/fintel-1994-thesis.pdf

Warfel, S. L. (1972). Some, Рeference, and Description. In Battle, J. H., Schweitzer, J. (Eds.) Mid-America Linguistics Conference Papers (стр. 41–49). Stillwater: Oklahoma State University.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.22190/TEME1803839M

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Print ISSN: 0353-7919
Online ISSN: 1820-7804