ATTITUDES OF INFERTILE WOMEN IN SERBIA TOWARDS THIRD-PARTY REPRODUCTION

Ana Bilinović, Marija Zotović, Marko Škorić, Ksenija Kričković Pele

DOI Number
10.22190/TEME1804107B
First page
1107
Last page
1122

Abstract


Third-party reproduction refers to the use of gametes, embryos or gestation that have been provided by a third party to enable an infertile individual or couple to become parent(s). The social, legal, and ethical acceptability of third-party reproduction varies around the world. In Serbia, there is a noticeable lack of data on attitudes towards infertility treatments involving the use of donated gametes, as well as surrogacy arrangements, due to the fact that this practice is banned in this country. The aim of this paper is to examine the attitudes of infertile women in Serbia towards third-party reproduction, i.e. gamete donation and surrogate motherhood as potential parts of their own infertility treatments. The sample included 50 infertile women involved in the program of in vitro fertilization, which amounts to at least 10% of the total number of women who go through the program of state-funded in vitro fertilization in Novi Sad each year. The questionnaire, constructed for the purpose of the study, was administered. The participants expressed negative attitudes towards using third-party gamete donation and surrogacy in their own infertility treatments. The negative attitudes were most prevalent among participants with low- and medium-level education. The potential reasons for such attitudes are discussed.


Keywords

infertility, Serbia, third-party reproduction, donated gametes, surrogacy

Full Text:

PDF

References


Anleu, S.L.R. (1992). Surrogacy: For love but not for money? Gender and Society, 6(1), 30-48. doi: 10.1177/089124392006001003

Baykal, B., Korkmaz, C., Ceyhan, S.T., Goktolga, U., & Baser, I. (2008). Opinions of infertile Turkish women on gamete donation and gestational surrogacy. Fertility and Sterility, 89(4), 817-822. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.04.022 pmid: 18406837

Beeson, D., Darnovsky, M., & Lippman, A. (2015). What's in a name? Variations in terminology of third-party reproduction. Reproductive BioMedicine Online 31(6), 805-814. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2015.09.004 pmid: 26526414

Bilinović, A. (2016). Uticaj asistirane reprodukcije na redefinisanje socioloških pojmova porodice i roditeljstva [The effect of assisted reproduction on redefining the sociological notions of family and parenthood]. (Doktorska disertacija) http://nardus.mpn.gov.rs/bitstream/handle/123456789/6542/Disertacija4519.pdf?sequence=1

Blagojević, M. (2007). Promene vrednosti i rodni režimi u zemljama u tranziciji – komparativna perspektiva. U: N. Petrušić, (ur.), Putevi ostvarivanja rodne ravnopravnosti i jednakih mogućnosti – Od ideje do prakse [Roads to achieve gender equality and equal opportunities – From idea to practice]. (str. 87–98). Beograd: Savet za ravnopravnost polova Vlade RS.

Bobić, M. (2003). Brak i/ili partnerstvo [Marriage and/or partnership]. Beograd: Čigoja štampa.

Corea, G. (2005). The subversive sperm: A false strain of blood. In: R. T. Hull (Ed.). Ethical Issues in the New Reproductive Technologies, Second edition. New York: Prometheus Books, (63-76).

Daniluk, J.C. & Koert, E. (2012). Childless Canadian men's and women's childbearing intentions, attitudes towards and willingness to use assisted human reproduction. Human Reproduction, 27(8), 2405-2412. doi: 10.1093/humrep/des190 pmid: 22684907

Daniluk, J.C., Koert, E., & Cheung, A. (2012). Childless women’s knowledge of fertility and assisted human reproduction: Identifying the gaps. Fertility and Sterility, 97(2), 420-426. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.11.046 pmid: 22192349

Drezgić, R. (2008). Od planiranja porodice do populacione politike – promene vladajuće paradigme u srpskoj demografiji krajem 20. veka [From family planning to population policy – changes in the ruling paradigm in Serbian demography at the end of the 20th century]. Filozofija i društvo, 19 (3), 181–215.

Drezgić, R. (2010). „Bela kuga” među „Srbima”: o naciji, rodu i rađanju na prelazu vekova “White plague“ among “Serbs“: about nation, gender and birth at the passage of centuries]. Beograd: Albatros plus, Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju.

Fisher, A.P. (2001). Still "not guite as good as having your own"? Toward a sociology of abortion. Annual Review of Sociology, 29(1), 335-361. doi: 10.1146/annurev.soc.29.010202.100209

Genuis, S.J., Chang, W.C., & Genuis, S.K. (1993). Public attitudes in Edmonton toward assisted reproductive technology. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 149(2), 153-161. pmid: 8324713

Greil, A.L. (2002). Infertile bodies: Medicalization, metaphor, and agency. In: M.C. Inhorn & F. van Balen (Eds.). Infertility around the Globe: New Thinking on Childlessness, Gender, and Reproductive Technologies. Berkeley: University of California Press, (101-118).

Ikemoto, L. I. (2009). Eggs as capital: Human egg procurement in the fertility industry and the stem cell research enterprise. Signs, 34(4), 763-781. doi: 10.1086/597131

Isikoglu, M., Senol, Y., Berkkanoglu, M., Ozgur, K., Donmez, L., & Stones-Abbasi, A. (2006). Public opinion regarding oocyte donation in Turkey: First data from a secular population among the Islamic world. Human Reproduction, 21(1), 318-323. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dei274 pmid: 16123084

Jackson, E. (2001). Regulating Reproduction: Law, Technology and Autonomy. Oxford: Hart Publishing.

Johnson, K.M. & Simon, R.M. (2012). Women's attitudes toward biomedical technology for infertility. Gender and Society, 26(2), 261-289. doi: 10.1177/0891243211434615

Krawiec, K.D. (2009). Sunny Samaritans and egomaniacs: Price-fixing in the gamete market. Law and Contemporary Problems, 72(3), 59-90.

Kričković Pele, K. (2014). Vantelesna oplodnja: rodne i društvene kontroverze [In vitro fertilisation: gender and social controversy]. Novi Sad: Zavod za ravnopravnost polova i ACIMSI Centar za rodne studije Univerziteta u Novom Sadu.

Kupka, M.S., D’Hooghe, T., Ferraretti, A.P., de Mouzon, J., Erb, K., Castilla, J.A., Calhaz-Jorge, C., De Geyter, C., & Goossens, V. (2016). Assisted reproductive technology in Europe: Results generated from European registers by ESHRE. Human Reproduction, 31(2), 233-248. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dev319

Manić, I. (2016). Porodične vrednosti mladih u Srbiji [Family values of young people in Serbia]. Sinteza, 9, 1–14.

McLachlan, H.V. & Swales, J.K. (2009). Commercial surrogate motherhood and the alleged commodification of children: A defense of legally enforceable contracts. Law and Contemporary Problems, 72(3), 91-107.

Milić, A. (2001). Sociologija porodice – kritika i izazovi [Sociology of the family – critique and challenges]. Beograd: Čigoja štampa.

Milić, A. (2010). Porodične vrednosne orijentacije – vrednosni raskol. U Vreme porodica [The time of family] (str. 235–256). Beograd: Čigoja štampa; Beograd: Institut za sociološka istraživanja Filozofskog fakulteta.

Poulton, J. & Oakeshott, P. (2012). Preventing maternal transmission of mitochondrial DNA disease: Nuclear transfer would be a major advance, but safe alternatives exist for most affected families. British Medical Journal, 345(7877), 10.

Robertson, J.A. (1994). Children of Choice: Freedom and the New Reproductive Technologies. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

Sandelowski, M. & de Lacey, S. (2002). The uses of a ’disease’: Infertility as rhetorical vehicle. In: M.C. Inhorn & F. van Balen (Eds.). Infertility around the Globe: New Thinking on Childlessness, Gender, and Reproductive Technologies. Berkeley: University of California Press, (33-51).

Shanley, M.L. (2002). Collaboration and commodification in assisted procreation: Reflections on an open market and anonymous donation in human sperm and eggs. Law and Society Review, 36(2), 257-284. doi: 10.2307/1512177

Skoog-Svanberg, A., Lampic, C., Bergh, T., & Lundkvist, O. (2003). Public opinion regarding oocyte donation in Sweden. Human Reproduction,18(5), 1107-1114. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deg222 pmid: 12721192

Službeni glasnik RS (2009a). Pravilnik o jedinstvenom registru donora reproduktivnih ćelija. [Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia. The Act on Treating Infertility via Biomedically Assisted Fertilization], Volume 72. Retrieved 30 July 2016 (Available from:

http://www.paragraf.rs/propisi/zakon_o_lecenju_neplodnosti_postupcima_biomedicinski_potpomognutog_oplodjenja.html).

Službeni glasnik RS (2009b). Zakon o lečenju neplodnosti postupcima biomedicinski potpomognutog oplođenja. [Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia. Rulebook on the Unique Register of Reproductive Cell Donors], Volume 85. Retrieved 30 July 2016 (Available from:

http://www.podaci.net/_gSRB/propis/Pravilnik_o_Jedinstvenom/P-jrdrce03v1385.html).

Stobel-Richter, Y., Goldschmidt, S., Brahler, E., Weidner, K., & Beutel, M. (2009). Egg donation, surrogate mothering, and cloning: attitudes of men and women in Germany based on a representative survey. Fertility and Sterility, 92(1), 124-130. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.05.015 pmid: 18684445

Twine, F.W. (2011). Outsourcing the Womb: Race, Class, and Gestational Surrogacy in a Global Market. New York: Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9780203834206

van Balen, F. & Inhorn, M.C. (2002). Interpreting infertility: A view from the social sciences. In: M.C. Inhorn & F. van Balen (Eds.). Infertility around the Globe: New Thinking on Childlessness, Gender, and Reproductive Technologies. Berkeley: University of California Press, (3-32).

Гавриловић, Д. & Стјепановић-Захаријевски, Д. (2012). Традиционалне и модерне вредности у транзиционој Србији [Traditional and modern values in transitional Serbia]. Теме, 36 (3), 1087–1102.

Захаријевски, Д. С. (2009). Полне/родне разлике у конституисању идентитета и породичних вредносних образаца [Sex/gender differences in the constitution of identity and family value patterns]. Годишњак за социологију, 5(5), 143–154.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.22190/TEME1804107B

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Print ISSN: 0353-7919
Online ISSN: 1820-7804