SOME ASPECTS OF RIGHT ON JUDICIAL PROTECTION OF PERSONS WITH MENTAL DISIBILITIES IN THE PROCEDURES FOR DEPRIVATION OF LEGAL CAPACITY - PRACTICE OF THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS-

Dušica Palačković, Sanda Ćorac

DOI Number
https://doi.org/10.22190/TEME171017035P
First page
581
Last page
598

Abstract


The paper analyzes certain important aspects of the procedural position of persons with mental disabilities in the procedures for deprivation of legal capacity. Regardless of the normative framework, both international and national, which largely protects the rights of this sensitive group of people, a significant number of cases before the European Court of Human Rights and decisions in which Contracting States are declared responsible indicate that there is a problem of their procedural position that is principally conditioned by applying (or not applying) the procedural safeguards provided by Article 6 of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, or the right to a fair trial. Although this right is guaranteed for all civil and criminal procedures and for all persons, the special features of persons with mental disabilities also determine the particularities in the application of the right to a fair trial in the court procedures in which these persons are involved. Therefore, we could talk about formulated specific standards that essentially elaborate one of the key concepts of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities - "reasonable adaptation", as well as a direct link to the need for a specific application of the already mentioned Article 6 of the European Convention. The standards that follow from the application of Article 6 are numerous and the analysis of all from the aspect of protecting the rights of persons with mental disabilities is not possible in the paper of this volume, and therefore, special attention was given to the right of these persons to initiate and conduct the procedures for deprivation of legal capacity, personal participation and representation in that procedures.


Keywords

Persons with mental disabilities, Procedure for deprivation of legal capacity, Right to judicial protection of persons with mental disabilities.

Full Text:

PDF (Cрпски)

References


Beker, K., Milošević, T. (2016). Poslovna sposobnost – Sudska praksa i zakoni u Srbiji 2016. godine [Legal capacity - jurisprudence and laws in Serbia in 2016.]. Beograd. Inicijativa za prava osoba sa mentalnim invaliditetom MDRI-S.

Dhanda, A. (2007). Legal Capacity in the Disability Rights Convention:Stranglehold of the Past or Lodestar for the Future?. Syracuse Journal of International Law and Commerce, 2, 429–462.

Dinerstein, R. (2012). Implementing Legal Capacity Under Article 12 of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities: The Difficult Road From Guardianship to Supported Decision-Making. Human Rights Brief, 2, 8-12.

Jovanović, M. (2014). Pravni položaj osoba sa invaliditetom [The legal status of persons with disabilities], Peščanik.net,http://pescanik.net/pravni-polozaj-osoba-sa-invaliditetom-2/.

Knol Radoja, K. (2015). Povreda procesnih prava osoba s invaliditetom [Violation of the procedural rights of persons with disabilities]. Zbornik Pravnog fakulteta u Zagrebu, 6, 931-954.

Kos, M. (2014). Lud, zbunjen, političan i subject [Crazy, confused, politically minded and subject], JAHR - European Journal of Bioethics, 9, 211-221.

Lawson, A. (2007). The United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities:New era or false dawn?. Syracuse Journal of International Law and Commerce, 2, 563-575.

Lewis, О. (2011). Advancing Legal Capacity Jurisprudence. European Human Rights Law Review, 6, 700-714.

Marković, M. (2012). Poslovna sposobnost kao univerzalno ljudsko pravo i determinanta društvenog položaja lica sa mentalnim invaliditetom [Legal capacity as a universal human right and a determinant of social status of people with mental disability], Stanovništvo, 2, 65-83.

Mégret, F. (2008). The Disabilities Convention: Human rights of persons with disabilities or disability rights?. Human Rights Quarterly, 30, 494-516.

Monitoring the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, Guidance for human Rights Monitors, Professional training series No. 17 (2010). Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, New York and Geneva.

Petrović, Ј. (2015). Sporna pitanja kod postupka lišenja poslovne sposobnosti [Contentious issues in the cases of deprivation of legal capacity], http://www.pravniportal.com/sporna-pitanja-kod-postupka-lisenja-poslovnesposobnosti/

Gajin, S., & Vlahović, S. (Ur.). (2014). Prava osoba sa mentalnim invaliditetom [The rights of persons with mental disabilities], Knjiga II: Pravni položaj u društvu Beograd: Centar za unapređenje pravnih studija

Tematski izveštaj Komesara Saveta Evrope za ljudska prava, Pravo na poslovnu sposobnost lica sa intelektualnim i psihosocijalnim invaliditetom - Ko može da odlučuje [Right to legal capacity for persons with intellectual and psychosocial disabilities - Who gets to decide?], 2013, https://www.coe.int/t/commissioner/source/prems/IP_LegalCapacity_serb.pdf

Triva, S., Dika, M. (2004). Građansko parnično procesno pravo [Civil lawsuit procedural law], Zagreb: Narodne novine.

World Health Organization. World Report on Disabilitiy (2011), http://www.who.int/disabilities/world_report/2011/report.pdf.

Драшкић, М. (2010). Нови стандарди за поступак лишења пословне способности: актуелна пракса Европског суда за људска права [New Standards in the Proceedings for Deprivation of Active Legal Capacity: Actual Case-Law of the European Court of Human Rights], Анали Правног факултета у Београду, 2, 355–370.

Opšti komentar člana 12 Konvencije o pravima osoba s invaliditetom [The General Comment on Article 12 of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities], Komitet za prava osoba s invaliditetom UN-a, 2014.

Петрушић, Н. (2015). Поступак за лишење пословне способности у праву Србије у контексту међународних стандарда о правима особа са инвалидитетом [Procedure for deprivation of legal capacity in Serbia in the context of international standards on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities]. Зборник радова Правног факултета у Нишу, 70, 903-920.

Петрушић, Н. (Ур.). (2012). Судска грађанскоправна заштита од дискриминације [Judicial civil protection against discrimination]. Београд: Повереник за заштиту равноправности и Правосудна академија.

Познић, Б., Ракић - Водинелић, В. (2015). Грађанско процесно право [Civil procedural law], Београд: Правни факултет Универзитета Унион у Београду и ЈП Службени гласник.

Правни извори

Европскa конвенцијa о заштити људских права и основних слобода [European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms], Савет Европе, CETS No.005, (1950)

Породични закон [Family Act], Службени гласник РС. Бр. 18 (2005)

Препорука Комитета министара Савета Европе бр. Р(2004)10 у вези заштите људских права и достојанства особа са менталним поремећајем [Council of Europe, Recommendation Rec(2004)10 of the Committee of Ministers to Member States concerning the protection of human rights and dignity of persons with mental disorder]

Препорука Комитета министара Савета Европе бр. Р(99)4 о принципима везаним за правну заштиту одраслих особа са инвалидитетом [Council of Europe, Recommendation No. R(99)4 of the Committee of Ministers to Member States on principles concerning the legal protection of incapable adults]

Конвенција о правима особа са инвалидитетом [Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities], УН – A/RES/61/106, (2006)

Одлуке Европског суда за људска права

A.N. v. Lithuania, No. 17280/08 од 31. маја 2016.

Alajos Kiss v. Hungary, No. 38832/06 од 20. маја 2010.

Ashingdane v. the United Kingdom, No. 8225/78 од 28. маја 1985.

Berková v. Slovakia, No. 67149/01 од 24. марта 2009.

Сentre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin Câmpeanu v. Romania, No.47848/08 од 17. јула 2014.

D.D. v. Lithuania , No.13469/06 од 14. фебруара 2012.

Enea v. Italy, No. 74912/01 од 17. септембра 2009.

Golder v. the United Kingdom, No. 4451/70 од 21. фебруара 1975.

Hadžimejlić and Others v. Bosnia and Herzegovina, No. 3427/13, 74569/13 and 7157/14 од 3. новембра 2015.

Iordache v. Romania, No. 6817/02 од 14. октобара 2008.

Ivinović v. Croatia, No.13006/13 од 18. септембра 2014.

Kędzior v. Poland, No. 45026/07 од 16. октобра 2012.

Krušković v. Croatia, No. 46185/08 од 21. јуна 2011.

M.S. v. Croatia, No. 36337/10 од 25. априла 2013.

Mihailovs v. Latvia, No. 35939/10 од 22. јануара 2013.

Nataliya Mikhaylenko v. Ukraine, No. 49069/11 од 30. маја 2013.

Mizzi v. Malta, No. 26111/02 од 12. јануара 2006.

Salontaj-Drobnjak v. Serbia, No. 36500/05 од 13. октобра 2009.

Shtukaturov v. Russia, No. 44009/05 од 27. марта 2008.

Stanev v. Bulgaria, No. 36760/06 од 17. јануара 2012.

Sýkora v. the Czech Republic, No. 23419/07 од 22. новембра 2012.

Vaudelle v. France, No. 35683/97 од 30. јануара 2001.

Winterwerp v. the Netherlands, No. 6301/73 од 24. октобра 1979.

X and Y v. Croatia, No.5193/09 од 3. новембра 2011.

X v. Croatia, No.11223/02 од 17. јуна 2008.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.22190/TEME171017035P

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Print ISSN: 0353-7919
Online ISSN: 1820-7804