TMG.  XXII  Br. 3-4  Str. 267 - 290  Niš  jul - decembar  1998.
UDK 338.246.2/.28(497)(497.1)
Prethodno saopštenje
Ivica Stojanović
Institut za međunarodnu politiku i privredu, Beograd
PRIVATIZACIJA PRIVREDA BALKANSKIH DRŽAVA SA OSVRTOM NA VLASNIČKU TRANSFORMACIJU U SR JUGOSLAVIJI
(Sličnosti i razlike )
Rezime
Sa razvojem sredstava komunikacije u savremenom svetu dolazi do značajnijih prožimanja kultura. Tako i akulturacioni procesi dobivaju na značaju i aktuelnosti. Dolazi i do promena nekih ustaljenih teorijskih stavova usled delovanja raznih kulturnih determinizama. Zato akulturacija postaje ponovni izazov za antropologe i sociologe kulture. Akulturacija je, u odnosu na druge kulturne procese, najsloženiji i najobuhvatniji proces kulturne dinamike. Istraživanjem akulturacije bave se brojne kulturološke nauke ali je, čini se, ovaj fenomen još uvek teorijski nedovoljno razjašnjen. Ovim radom se pokušava dati prilog definisanju akulturacije, prvenstveno sa stanovišta sociologije kulture. Akulturacija je, u odnosu na druge kulturne procese, najsloženiji i najobuhvatniji proces kulturne dinamike. Istraživanjem akulturacije bave se brojne kulturološke nauke ali je, čini se, ovaj fenomen još uvek teorijski nedovoljno razjašnjen. Ovim radom se pokušava dati prilog definisanju akulturacije, prvenstveno sa stanovišta sociologije kulture. U članku koji je pred Vama, pored akulturacije kao najsloženijeg i najobuhvatnijeg kulturnog procesa, definišu se i ostali procesi kulturne dinamike - difuzija, asimilacija, selekcija, rezistencija. Svi oni su iskustveno nedeljivi i po pravilu teku ili vremenski paralelno sa akulturacijom ili sukcesivno u odnosu na nju. Time se akulturacija određuje kao kompleksan društveno kulturni fenomen.
Ključne reči: kultura, akulturacija, kulturna dinamika, kulturološke nauke, asimilacija.
REPRIVATIZATION OF BALKAN ECONOMIES: AN OVERVIEW TO OWNERSHIP TRANSFORMATION OF IN FR YUGOSLAVIA
(Similarities and Differences)
Summary
The author has analyzed the processes of reprivatization and ownership transformation in Slovenia, Croatia, Romania, Macedonia and Bulgaria. Special consideration is given the to study of ownership transformation in FR Yugoslavia, this implying Serbia and Montengro. Reprivatization in the above mentioned countries is presented chronologically. The author has pointed to the models, forms of reprivatization, role of the state and the results that have been achieved so far in the process of ownership transformation and reprivatization. The situation in FR Yugoslavia, or actually Serbia and Montenegro, is specially analyzed. The author has presented the peculiarities of this process in Yugoslavia comparing it with those in other Balkan states. A theoretical and practical explanation of some differences is given, empahisizing that the diffferences do not change the essence of the set goal. Actually, the goal is to build market economies in all Balkan states. The differences include the ways, methods and dynamics of the goal that should be achieved, and partly the character of the market economy. The ways and methods for building of a liberal concept of market economy differ from those which are applied for building of a controlled market economy. Regardless of the differences in reprivatization and ownership transformation in the Balkan countries the similarities among them in those processes are much greater. They point to to the fact that the process of social and economic changes in the Balkans cannot be stopped and it is a prerequisite for establishment of an improved cooperation and better understanding of the Balkan states and achievement of their more rapid development and progress.
Key words: economy, privatization, property transformation, Yugoslavia, the Balkans.