THE MEDIA AS MACHINERY OF PERSUASION

Velibor Petković

DOI Number
https://doi.org/10.22190/TEME231001016V
First page
293
Last page
308

Abstract


The process of informing through the media, as well as direct face-to-face communication, is inevitably also a process of persuasion and imposing opinions. This act itself is natural, but experience tells us that rational logical argumentation does not bring an advantage in the exchange of opinions under a strong emotional charge. This phenomenon is not new, as even in ancient Greece the younger sophists failed Protagoras when they replaced the search for truth with the art of persuasion that will make weak claims stronger. Thus, oratory became eristic, the art of arguing with the aim of refuting someone else’s opinion. Skilled polemicists do not look for the truth, but for arguments that support their point of view. The development of technology and media forms have perfected this process and have euphemistically renamed the lie itself as the ‘post-truth’, which is useful and thereby justified. Kant’s observation about poetry as a creative imagination, and rhetoric as an insidious skill that turns people into ‘machinery of persuasion’ is used by the modern media for the creation of informative-entertaining content to achieve commercial and ideological goals. The all-powerful media machines abolish the objective perception of events and lead modern society into a decay that many civilizations have already experienced. Deus ex machina has become an omnipresent Deus ex media that solves nothing, but turns everything into a process of endless entertainment, a spectacle in which reason is enslaved by passions.


Keywords

media manipulation, eristic process of persuasion, people as machinery of persuasion, endless commercial-ideological entertainment, media god of spectacle.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bahtin, M. (1978/1965). Stvaralaštvo Fransoa Rablea i narodna kultura srednjega veka i renesanse [The creativity of François Rabelais and the folk culture of the Middle Ages and the Renaissance]. Beograd: Nolit.

Bodrijar, Ž. (2008). Simulakrumi i simulacija [Simulacrums and simulation], prema: Đorđević, Jelena, zbornik Studije kulture [Cultural Studies]. Beograd: Službeni glasnik.

Crnobrnja, S. (2010). Estetika televizije i novih medija [Aesthetics of television and new media]. Beograd: Clio.

Damasio, A. (1994). Descartes’ Error: Emotion, Reason, and the Human Braine, New York, Putnam.

Debord, G. (2006/1967). Društvo spektakla [Society of Spectacle]. Beograd: Porodična biblioteka https://anarhisticka-biblioteka.net/library/guy-debord-drustvo-spektakla-sr

Dreyfus, H. (1998). Kierkegaard on the Internet: Anonymity vs. Commitment in the Present Age https://pile.sdbs.cz/docs/dreyfus1999.pdf

From, E. (1998/1976). Imati ili biti [To have or to be]. Beograd: Narodna knjiga – Alfa.

Habermas, J. (2018/1962). Javno mnjenje - Структурална трансформација јавне сфере [Public Opinion – Structural transformation of the public sphere]. Beograd: Mediterran.

Haidt, J. (2022). Psihologija morala [Moral psychology - The Righteous Mind]. Beograd: Clio.

Hessel, S. (2011). Pobunite se! [Indignez vous!]. Beograd: VBZ.

Hume, D. (1983). Rasprava o ljudskoj prirodi [A Treatise of Human Nature]. Sarajevo: Veselin Masleša.

Hobsbawm, E. (2008). Globalizacija, demokratija i terorizam [Globalization, democracy and terrorism]. Beograd: Arhipelag.

James, W. (1950/1890). The Principles of Psychology. New York: Dover.

Kant, I. (1975). Kritika moći suđenja [Critique of the Power of Judgment]. Beograd: BIGZ.

Kellner, D. (2004). Medijska kultura [Media Culture]. Beograd: Clio.

Lerner Ј. S., Tetlock, P. E. (2003). Bridging Individual, Interpersonal, and Istitutional Approaches to Judgment and Decision Making: The Impact of Accountability on Cognitive Bias. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Lyotard, J-F. (2005/1979). Postmoderno stanje [The Postmodern Condition]. Zagreb: Ibis.

Manovič, L. (2015/2001). Jezik novih medija [The language of The New Media]. Beograd: Clio.

McLuhan, M. (1964). Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man. Copyright by Gingko Press.

McLuhan, M., Fiore, Q. (1968). War and Peace in the Global Vilage. New York: Bantam, reissued by Gingko Press (2001).

Маклуан, М. (1971). Познавање општила – човекових продужетака [Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man]. Београд: БИГЗ.

Močnik, R. (1999). Kraj velikih priča (u) Koliko fašizma? [End of big stories (in) How much fascism?]. Zagreb: Arkzin.

Mor, T. (2002/1516). Utopija [Utopia]. Beograd: Izdavačka kuća Utopija.

Ниче, Ф. (2001). Рођење трагедије [The Birth of Tragedy]. Београд: Дерета.

Oxford Learner’s Dictionary https://languages.oup.com/word-of-the-year/2016/

Platon (2023). Protagora [Protagoras]. Beograd: Dereta.

Platon (1993). Država [The Republic], Beograd: BIGZ.

Schopenhauer, A. (1997). Eristička dijalektika ili Umeće kako da se uvek bude u pravu objašnjeno u 38 trikova [Eristic Dialectic or The Art of Always Being Right]. Novi Sad: Svetovi.

Stamenković, I., Mitrović, M. (2023). The Motivation for Using the Social Media Platform TikTok from the Perspective of the Uses and Gratifications Theory, Media Studies and Applied Ethics, 4(2), 9-23.

Vučković, J., Lučić, S. (2023). Hate speech and social media, Teme, XLVII(1), 191-207. https://doi.org/10.22190/TEME221006012V

Vuksanović, D. (2011). Istina u eri medija [Truth in the Media era] u: Vuksanović, D. Filozofija medija 2: ontologija, estetika, kritika [Media philosophy 2: ontology, aesthetics, criticism]. Beograd: Čigoja.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.22190/TEME231001016V

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


© University of Niš, Serbia
Creative Commons licence CC BY-NC-ND
Print ISSN: 0353-7919
Online ISSN: 1820-7804