CONTEMPORARY THEORETICAL DEBATES ON ECONOMIC POLICY: LESSONS FOR THE POST-PANDEMIC PERIOD
Abstract
Following the Global Financial Crisis of 2007, intense scrutiny on the validity of the mainstream macroeconomic model (New Consensus Macroeconomics) and its economic policy implications emerged in the academic community. The crisis revealed significant flaws in the traditional understanding of economic dynamics, especially regarding financial market regulation and systemic risk management. Additionally, the unprecedented impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the global economy served as another test for the current macroeconomic paradigm. The pandemic-induced economic crisis exposed vulnerabilities in the global economic system, highlighting deep-rooted inequalities and structural weaknesses. Once again, doubts arose about the applicability of current macroeconomic models in addressing such complex challenges. This paper seeks to assess the ongoing theoretical debate surrounding the effectiveness of economic policies and discuss their implications for the post-pandemic period. It argues that the macroeconomic role of fiscal policy should be respected, not only when economic disorders occur but also in periods of economic stability. However, the risks associated with increased indebtedness in both advanced and emerging economies are linked to fiscal and financial dominance issues, which may escalate in the future. Therefore, this paper contends that economic policymakers should apply the proper economic-policy mix to address the current and future economic challenges.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Begg, I. (2021). The post Covid-19 new normal, a time for the decidedly abnormal: an opportunity for modern monetary theory?”, https://www.funcas.es /articulos/the-post-covid-19-new-normal-a-time-for-the-decidedly-abnormal-an-opportunity-for-modern-monetary-theory/
Benigno, P., Canofari, P., Di Bartolomeo, G., & Messori, M. (2021). Financial Dominance in the Pandemic and Post-Pandemic European Economy. Publication for the committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs, Policy Department for Economic, Scientific and Quality of Life Policies, European Parliament, Luxembourg.
Boone, L., Fels, J., Jorda, O., Schularick, M., & Taylor, A. M. (2022). Debt: The Eye of the Storm. Geneva Reports on the World Economy, 24, Centar for Economic Policy Press.
Buti M., & Papaconstantinou, G. (2021). The Legacy of the Pandemic: How Covid-19 is Reshaping Economic Policy in the EU. CEPR Policy Insight No. 109.
Carlsson-Szlezak, Philipp, Reeves, M. & Swartz, P. (2020). Understanding the Economic Shock of Coronavirus. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2020/03/understanding-the-economic-shock-of-coronavirus
Coibion, O., Gorodnichenko, Y., & Weber, M. (2020). Labor Markets During the COVID-19 Crisis: A Preliminary View. Working Paper No. 27017, Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
Drumetz, F., & Pfister, C. (2021). Modern Monetary Theory: A Wrong Compass for Decision-Making. Intereconomics, 56(6), 355-361.
Hooper, P., Mishkin, F. S., & Sufi, A. (2020). Prospects for inflation in a high pressure economy: Is the Phillips curve dead or is it just hibernating? Research in Economics, 74(1), 26-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rie.2019.11.004
International Monetary Fund. (2022). Fiscal Monitor. Retrieved on January 15, 2024, from https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/FM
Jackson A., Jackson, T., & Lerven, F. V. (2022). Beyond the Debt Controversy: Re-framing Fiscal and Monetary Policy for a Post-pandemic Era. CUSP Working Paper No. 31, Centre for the Understanding of Sustainable Prosperity.
Jayadev, A., & Mason, J. W. (2018). Mainstream Macroeconomics and Modern Monetary Theory: What Really Divides Them? Institute for New Economic Thinking.
Kotilainen, K. (2022). A Cosmopolitan Reading of Modern Monetary Theory. Global Society, 36(1), 89-112. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600826.2021.1898343
Lastauskas, P., & Stakėnas, J. (2020). Labor market reforms and the monetary policy environment. European Economic Review, 128, 103509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2020.103509
Leeper, E. M., & Zhou, X. (2021). Inflation’s role in optimal monetary-fiscal policy. Journal of Monetary Economics, 124, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoneco.2021.10.006
Lerner A. (1943). Functional Finance and the Federal Debt. Social Research, 10, 38-51.
Lim, C., Columba, F, Costa, A., Kongsamut, P., Otani, A., Saiyid, M., Wezel, T., & Wu, X. (2011). Macroprudential Policy: What Instruments and How to Use Them? Lessons from Country Experiences. IMF Working Paper WP/11/238, Washington: International Monetary Fund.
Mihajlović, V., Marjanović, G. (2020). Contemporary concepts of the Phillips curve and macroeconomic stabilisation policy. Teme, Vol. XLIV, No. 2, 519-532. https://doi.org/10.22190/TEME180702037M
Mihajlović, V. (2023). Macroeconomic policy response to pandemic: A paradigm shift in sight? In: A. Praščević, M. Jakšić, M. Arandarenko, D. Trifunović & M. Ješić (Eds.), 3rd International Interdepartmental Conference “Shaping Post-COVID World – Challenges for Economic Theory and Policy” (pp. 89-105), Conference Proceedings. Belgrade: Faculty of Economics and Business.
Mitchell, W., & Wray, R. L. (2004). Full employment through a Job Guarantee: a response to the critics. Working Paper No. 04-13, Centre of Full Employment and Equity, Callaghan, Australia.
Moosavi, J., Fathollahi-Fard, A. M., & Dulebenets, M. A. (2022). Supply chain disruption during the COVID-19 pandemic: Recognizing potential disruption management strategies. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 75, 102983. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.102983
Prentice, C., Chen, J., & Stantic, B. (2020) Timed intervention in COVID-19 and panic buying. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 57, 102203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2020.102203
Prinz, A. L., & Beck H. (2021). Modern Monetary Theory: A Solid Theoretical Foundation of Economic Policy? Atlantic Economic Journal, 49, 173-186. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11293-021-09713-6
Sakai, Y. (2024). Fiscal Theory of Price Level and Modern Monetary Theory. In: Deflation and Fiscal Deficits. SpringerBriefs in Economics. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-0415-6_4
Skott, P. (2016). Aggregate demand, functional finance, and secular stagnation. European Journal of Economics and Economic Policies: Intervention, 13(2), 172-188. https://doi.org/10.4337/ejeep.2016.02.03
Skott, P., Costa Santos, J. F., & Oreiro, C. (2022). Supermultipliers, ‘endogenous autonomous demand’ and functional finance. Metroeconomica, 73(1), 220-244. https://doi.org/10.1111/meca.12360
Stiglitz, J. E. (2021). The proper role of government in the market economy: The case of the post-COVID recovery. Journal of Government and Economics, 1(2021), 100004, 1-7.
Taylor, L. (2019). Synthetic MMT: Old Line Keynesianism with an Expansionary Twist. Institute for New Economic Thinking Working Paper Series, (103).
Tymoigne, E. & Wray. L. R. (2015). Modern Monetary Theory: A Reply to Palley. Review of Political Economy, 27(1), 24-44. https://doi.org/10.1080/09538259.2014.957471
Tymoigne, E. (2021). Seven Replies to the Critiques of Modern Money Theory. Working Paper No. 996, Levy Economic Institute of Bard College.
Ullah, S. (2023). Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Financial Markets: a Global Perspective. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 14, 982-1003 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-022-00970-7
Vernengo, M., & Pérez Caldentey, E. (2020). Modern Money Theory (MMT) in the Tropics: Functional Finance in Developing Countries. Challenge, 63(6), 332-348. https://doi.org/10.1080/05775132.2020.1747729
Woodford, M. (1994). Monetary policy and price level determinacy in a cash-in-advance economy. Economic Theory, 4(3), 345-380. https://www.jstor.org/stable/25054770
Wray, R. L. (2008). Financial Markets Meltdown: What Can We Learn from Minsky? Public Policy Brief, Higlihts, No. 94A, Annandale-on-Hudson, New York: The Levy Economics Institute of Bard College.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.22190/TEME240508027M
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
© University of Niš, Serbia
Creative Commons licence CC BY-NC-ND
Print ISSN: 0353-7919
Online ISSN: 1820-7804