Bisera Jevtić, Marija Jovanović

DOI Number
First page
Last page


Encouragement of humanistic education through the lens of prosocial behavior of adolescents is a complex and extensive issue of the modern world. Prosocial behaviour can indirectly affect the achievement of pupils at school through its connection with some academically relevant forms of behaviour which lead to success at school and work. Also, this connection can be explained by the teacher’s preferences of prosocial pupils, which is reflected in the teacher’s expectations and behaviour towards pupils, as well as the evaluation of their work. Besides, prosocial behaviour can also directly affect pupils since the prosocial interaction of peers can have a positive effect on the intellectual exchanges between pupils, which contributes to a more successful learning process. Taking into consideration the significance and role of the school and teachers, as representatives of the educational process, in encouraging prosocial behaviour in the young at secondary schools, we face a problem: Do secondary school teachers encourage prosocial humanistic behaviour of the young, by what actions and activities are they guided in the process and how does that reflect on the behaviour of pupils? This study tried to give some answers related to this problem in the field of education.


humanistic education, prosocial behaviour, moral pedagogy, teachers, achievement.

Full Text:



Bandura, A. et al. (1996). Multifaced impact of self-efficacy beliefs on academic functioning. Child Development, 67, 1206–1222.

Batson, D. (2008). Empathy-Induced Altruistic Motivation. Departmen of Psihology. University of Kansas.

Batson, D. & Shaw, L. (1991). Evidence for Altruism: Toward a Pluralism of Prosocial Motives. Psyhological Inquiry, 2, 107-122.

Bursuck, W. D. & Asher, S. R. (1986): The relationship between social competence andachievement in elementary school children. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 15, 41-49.

Caprara, G.V. et al: (2000). Prosocial foundations of children’s academic achievement. Psychological Science, 11, No. 4, 302–306.

Chen, X., Rubin, K.H. & Li, D. (1997). Relations between academic achievement and social adjustment: evidence from Chinese children. Developmental Psychology, 33, No.3, 518–525.

De Waal, F. B. (2008). Putting the altruism back into altruism: The evolution of empathy. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 279-300.

Eisenberg, N. & Mussen, P.H. (1989). The roots of prosocial behavior in children. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Eisenberg, N.,&Valiente,C. (2002). Parenting and children’s prosocial and moral development. In M. H. Bornstein (Ed.), Handbook of parenting: 5. Practical issues in parenting (2nd ed., 111–142).

Estell, D.B. et al. (2002). Social relations and academic achievement in inner-city earl elementary classrooms. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 26, No. 6, 518–528.

Feshbach, N.D. & Feshbach, S. (1987). Affective processes and academic achievement. Child Development, 58, No. 3, 1335–1347.

Green, K.D. et al. (1980). An assessment of the relationship among measures of children’s social competence and children’s academic achievement. Child Development, 51, No. 4, 1149–1156.

Grusec, J. E., Davidov, M.,& Lundell, L. (2002). Prosocial and helping behavior: Blackwell handbooks of developmental psychology. In Hart & Smith (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of childhood social development, 457–474.

Hastings, P.D., Utendale, W.,& Sullivan, C. (2007). The socialization of prosocial development. In Grusec, & Hastings (Eds.), Handbook of Socialization, 638-664.

Jevtić, B. (2015). Pedagogija moralnosti [Pedagogy of Morality]. Niš: Filozofski fakultet.

Jevtić, B. (2017). The attitude of teachers towards prosocial behavior and academic achievement in Serbia. Problems of Education in the 21st century, 75, No.1, 34-54.

Joksimović, S. & Vasović, M. (1990). Psychological foundations of humanity. Belgrade: Institute for Educational Research and education.Joksimović, S. (1993). Dimensions and indicators of prosocial behavior. Proceedings of the Institute for Educational Research. 25, 9-24.

Kakavulis, A. (1997). Altruism in early childhood: how parents see the altruistic behavior of their children. Education and altruism. Institute for Educational Research, 237-252.

Knafo, A. & Plomin, R. (2006). Prosocial Behavior From Early to Middle Childhood: Genetic and Environmental Influences on Stability and Change. Developmental Psychology. 42, No. 5, 771-786.

Lobocki. M. (1997). Altruism as the main aim of family education. Education and altruism. Institute for Educational Research, 112-119.

McDonald, N. M., & Messinger, D. S. (2010). The Development of Empathy: How, When, and. Why. USA: Department of Psychology, University of Miami.

Omerović, M., Džaferagić-Franca A. (2012). Aktivno učenje u osnovnoj školi [Active Learning in Primary Schools]. Metodički obzori, 7(1), 167–181.

Rotheram, M.J. (1987). Children’s social and academic competence. Journal of Educational Research, 80, No. 4, 206–211.

Sakač, M. (2008). Neki psihološki činioci školskog postignuća [Some Psychological Component of School Achievement]. Norma, 13(3), 29–36.

Staub, E. (1978). Positive social behavior and morality: social and personal influence. New York: Academic Press.

Suzić, N. (2001). The emotional dimension of motivation to continue. Banja Luka: Faculty of Philosophy.

Švec, Š. (1997). Humanistički orijentisano obrazovanje kao model za razvoj altruizma [Humanistically Oriented Education as a Model for the Development of Altruism]. Vaspitanje i altruizam, 120–130.

Twenge, J. et al. (2007). Social Exclusion Decreases Prosocial Behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, No. 1, 56-66.

Zahn-Waxler, C.,& Kochanska, G. (1990). The origins of guilt: Current theory and research in motivation. In R. A. Thompson (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation: 36. Socioemotional development, 183–258.

Wentzel, K.R. (1991). Relations between social competence and academic achievement in early adolescence. Child Development, 62, 1066–1078.

Wentzel, K. R. (1993). Does being good make the grade? Social behavior and academic competence in middle school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, No. 2, 357–364.

Žilínek, M. (1997). Etos a utváranie mravnej identity. Bratislava: IRIS.



  • There are currently no refbacks.

© University of Niš, Serbia
Creative Commons licence CC BY-NC-ND
Print ISSN: 0353-7919
Online ISSN: 1820-7804