CHANGING THE LEGAL STATUS OF ANIMALS: LEGISLATION AND LITIGATION

Zorana Todorović

DOI Number
https://doi.org/10.22190/TEME210114044T
First page
835
Last page
849

Abstract


This paper addresses the issue of the legal status of non-human animals and the possibility of changing it from the status of things or property, to the status of non-things, or better, sentient beings. Key arguments for the change of their status are discussed, including the argument from marginal cases, and the scientific evidence indicating that many animals are sentient beings. Two ways of initiating such changes seem most promising: legislation, i.e. the modification of civil codes, and litigation, i.e. filing lawsuits on behalf of individual animals. It is argued that legislative changes are necessary for moving animals out of the legal category of things and into the category of sentient beings that can bear rights. On the other hand, litigation could bring about a more radical change of the legal status of some animals.

Keywords

Animals, legal status, sentient beings, things, rights.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Avramović, S. (2018). Mixture of legal identities: Case of the Dutch (1838) and the Serbian Civil Code (1844). Annals of the Faculty of Law in Belgrade 66/4, 13-37.

Barkham, P. (2014). Sandra the ‘nonhuman person’ is sadly not the face of a welfare revolution. The Guardian, 24 December.

Bentham, J. (1781/1907). The Principles of Morals and Legislation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Brels, S. (2016). The evolution of the legal status of animals: From things to sentient beings. The Conscious Lawyer, January 2016.

Cavalieri, P. & Singer, P. (1993). The Great Ape Project - and Beyond. In: Cavalieri, Paola and Singer, Peter (eds.). The great ape project: Equality beyond humanity. New York: St. Martin's Griffin.

Cochrane, A. (2013). From Human Rights to Sentient Rights. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 16 (5), 655–75.

Contreras, C. (2016). Sentient Beings Protected by Law. Global Journal of Animal Law (GJAL) 2/2016.

Darwin, Ch. (1871/1981). The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.

DeGrazia, David (1996). Taking Animals Seriously: Mental Life and Moral Status. Cambridge University Press.

Descartes, R. (1637/1971). Le Discours de la Méthode. Paris: Librairie Marcel Didier.

Francione, G. (1995). Animals, Property and the Law (Ethics and Action). Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

Giménez-Candela, T. (2015). An Overview of Spanish Animal Law, in: Favre, D. and Giménez-Candela, T. (eds.). Animales y Derecho. Valencia: Tirant lo Blanch, 222-228.

Gorman, J. (2013). Rights Group is Seeking Status of ‘Legal Person’ for Captive Chimpanzee. The New York Times, 2 December.

Kant, I. (1784-5/1997). Lectures on Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

McMahan, J. (2015). The Comparative Badness for Animals of Suffering and Death. In: Tatjana Višak i Robert Garner (eds.), The Ethics of Killing Animals. Oxford University Press, 65-85.

Michel, M.  Kayasseh, E. S. (2011). The Legal Situation of Animals in Switzerland: Two Steps Forward, One Step Back - Many Steps to Go, Journal of Animal Law, vol. VII, 1-42.

Mountain, M. (2013). “Lawsuit Filed Today on Behalf of Chimpanzee Seeking Legal Personhood“. https://www.nonhumanrights.org/blog/lawsuit-filed-today-on-behalf-of-chimpanzee-seeking-legal-personhood/

Panksepp, J. (2011). Cross-Species Affective Neuroscience Decoding of the Primal Affective Experiences of Humans and Related Animals. PLoS ONE 6(9): e21236.

Paunović, M. (2004). Prava životinja: savremeni međunarodni standardi [Animal rights: modern international standards]. Beograd: Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu.

Regan, T. (2003). Animal Rights, Human Wrongs: an introduction to moral philosophy. Lanham: Roman & Littlefield Publishers Inc.

Scruton, R. (2000). Animal rights and wrongs. London: Demos.

Shyam, G. (2015). The legal status of animals: The world rethinks its position. Alternative Law Journal 40(4), 266-270.

Singer, P. (1975). Animal Liberation. New York: HarperCollins Publishers Inc.

Tanner, J. (2006). Marginal humans, the argument from kinds and the similarity argument. Facta Universitatis Series: Philosophy, Sociology and Psychology, 5(1), 47–63.

Wise, S. (2010). Legal personhood and the nonhuman rights project; https://www.lclark.edu/live/files/8137-171-wise




DOI: https://doi.org/10.22190/TEME210114044T

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


© University of Niš, Serbia
Creative Commons licence CC BY-NC-ND
Print ISSN: 0353-7919
Online ISSN: 1820-7804