THE INFLUENCE OF THE EXPERIMENTAL CONTEXT ON LEXICAL AMBIGUITY EFFECTS

Ksenija Mišić, Dušica Filipović Đurđević

DOI Number
https://doi.org/10.22190/TEME210418030M
First page
577
Last page
596

Abstract


Previous research with the visual lexical decision task demonstrated that polysemous words (multiple related senses) have a processing advantage when compared to unambiguous words, whereas homonymous words (multiple unrelated meanings) have a processing disadvantage. Although the same pattern of results was observed in Serbian, the two effects were investigated in separate studies. The aim of this study was to test whether the effects can be replicated when both types of ambiguity are presented within the same experimental list. To test this, we conducted three experiments. In the first one, the mixed presentation of unambiguous, homonymous, and polysemous words did not reveal any of the ambiguity effects, leading to the conclusion that the experimental context may affect the emergence of ambiguity effects. The other two experiments were conducted to explicitly control for the experimental context. In both experiments, we presented each ambiguity type within the same block and counterbalanced the order of the block presentation. These experiments revealed the presence of the polysemy advantage, but not the homonymy disadvantage, which is a common pattern in literature. Polysemy effects typically emerge relatively easily, whereas the homonymy disadvantage requires additional conditions. Finally, we conclude that experimental context does play a role in ambiguity processing, although the order of presentation does not affect the overall results.

Keywords

lexical ambiguity, polysemy, homonymy, experimental context

Full Text:

PDF

References


Allan, K. (Ed.). (2009). Concise Encyclopedia of Semantics. Elsevier.

Armstrong, B. C., & Plaut, D. C. (2016). Disparate semantic ambiguity effects from semantic processing dynamics rather than qualitative task differences. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 31(7), 940–966. https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2016.1171366

Armstrong, B. C., Tokowicz, N., & Plaut, D. C. (2012). eDom: norming software and relative meaning frequencies for 544 English homonyms. Behavior Research Methods, 44(4), 1015–1027. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-012-0199-8

Azuma, T., & Van Orden, G. C. (1997). Why SAFE Is Better Than FAST: The Relatedness of a Word’s Meanings Affects Lexical Decision Times. Journal of Memory and Language, 36(4), 484–504. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1997.2502

Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D., & Bates, D. (2008). Mixed-effects modelling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59(4), 390–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005

Baayen, R. H., & Milin, P. (2010). Analyzing Reaction Times. International Journal of Psychological Research, 3(2), 12–28. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.12.4.395

Barr, D. J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H. J. (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68(3), 255–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001

Bates, D., Kliegl, R., Vasishth, S., & Baayen, R. H. (2015). Parsimonious mixed models. https://arxiv.org/abs/1506.04967

Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B. M., & Walker, S. C. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01

Cruse, A. (2000). Meaning in language: An introduction to semantics and pragmatics. Oxford University Press.

Dragićević, R. (2010). Leksikologija srpskog jezika [Lexicology of the Serbian language]. Zavod za udžbenike.

Eddington, C. M., & Tokowicz, N. (2015). How meaning similarity influences ambiguous word processing: the current state of the literature. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 22, 13–37. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-014-0665-7

Filipović Đurđević, D. (2019). Balance of Meaning Probabilities in Processing of Serbian Homonymy. Primenjena Psihologija, 12(3), 283–304. https://doi.org/10.19090/pp.2019.3.283-304

Filipović Đurđević, D., & Kostić, A. (2008). The effect of polysemy on processing of Serbian nouns. Psihologija, 41(1), 69–86. https://doi.org/10.2298/PSI0801059F

Filipović Đurđević, D., & Kostić, A. (2017). Number, Relative Frequency, Entropy, Redundancy, Familiarity, and Concreteness of Word Senses: Ratings for 150 Serbian Polysemous Nouns. In S. Halupka-Rešetar & S. Martinez-Ferreiro (Eds.), Studies in Language and Mind (pp. 13–77). Faculty of Philosohy, University of Novi Sad. http://digitalna.ff.uns.ac.rs/sadrzaj/2017/978-86-6065-446-7

Filipović Đurđević, D., & Kostić, A. (2021). We probably sense sense probabilities. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience. https://doi.org/0.1080/23273798.2021.1909083

Gelman, A., & Hill, J. (2006). Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511790942

Gortan-Premk, D. (1984). Polisemija i homonimija u srpskohrvatskom jeziku [Polysemy and homonymy in Serbo-croatian]. Zbornik Matice Srpske za filologiju i lingvistiku 27-28, 183–188.

Gortan-Premk, D. (Ed.). (2003). Semantičko-derivacioni rečnik. Filozofski Fakultet, Odsek za Srpski Jezik i Lingvistiku.

Gortan-Premk, D. (2004). Polisemija i organizacija leksičkog sistema u srpskome jeziku. [Polysemy and the organisation of the lexical system in Serbian language]. Zavod za udžbenike i nastavna sredstva.

Gortan-Premk, D. (2018). Platisemija i similisemija u polisemantičkoj strukturi jedne lekseme. [Platysemy and simisemy in poliysemantic structure of a lexeme] Naš jezik, 49(1), 1–12

Grickat, I. (1967). Stilske figure u svetlu jezičkih analiza. [Figures of speech in the light of linguistic analyses] Naš jezik, 16(4) 217-235.

Hino, Y., Kusunose, Y., & Lupker, S. J. (2010). The relatedness-of-meaning effect for ambiguous words in lexical-decision tasks: when does relatedness matter? Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology = Revue Canadienne de Psychologie Expérimentale, 64(3), 180–196. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020475

Hino, Y., Lupker, S. J., & Pexman, P. M. (2002). Ambiguity and Synonymy Effects in Lexical Decision, Naming, and Semantic Categorization Tasks: Interactions between Orthography, Phonology, and Semantics. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 28(4), 686–713. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.28.4.686

Hino, Y., Pexman, P. M., & Lupker, S. J. (2006). Ambiguity and relatedness effects in semantic tasks: Are they due to semantic coding? Journal of Memory and Language, 55(2), 247–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2006.04.001

Klepousniotou, E. (2002). The Processing of Lexical Ambiguity: Homonymy and Polysemy in the Mental Lexicon. Brain and Language, 81(1–3), 205–223. https://doi.org/10.1006/brln.2001.2518

Klepousniotou, E., & Baum, S. R. (2007). Disambiguating the ambiguity advantage effect in word recognition: An advantage for polysemous but not homonymous words. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 20(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneuroling.2006.02.001

Klepousniotou, E., Titone, D., & Romero, C. (2008). Making Sense of Word Senses: The Comprehension of Polysemy Depends on Sense Overlap. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 34(6), 1534–1543. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013012

Kostić, Đ. (1999). Frekvencijski rečnik savremenog srpskog jezika [Frequency dictionary of the contemporary Serbian language]. Institut za eksperimentalnu fonetiku i patologiju govora i Laboratorija za eksperimentalnu psihologiju.

Lopukhina, A., Laurinavichyute, A., Lopukhin, K., & Dragoy, O. (2018). The mental representation of polysemy across word classes. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 192. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00192

Lyons, J. (1977). Semantics, volume 2. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139165693

Mathôt, S., Schreij, D., & Theeuwes, J. (2012). OpenSesame: An open-source, graphical experiment builder for the social sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 44(2), 314-324. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-011-0168-7

Matuschek, H., Kliegl, R., Vasishth, S., Baayen, R. H., & Bates, D. (2017). Balancing Type I error and power in linear mixed models. Journal of Memory and Language, 94, 305–315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2017.01.001

Mišić, K. & Filipović Đurđević, D. (2019). Testing semantic settling dynamics model predictions – homonym meaning uncertainty. Current Trends in Psychology Book of Abstracts, Faculty of Philosophy, Novi Sad, October 24–27, 2019, Book of Abstracts, 119–120.

Mišić, K., & Filipović Đurđević, D. (2021). Redesigning the exploration of semantic dynamics: SSD account in light of regression design. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1177/17470218211048386

R Core Team. (2018). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.r-project.org/

Rodd, J. M. (2020). Settling Into Semantic Space: An Ambiguity-Focused Account of Word-Meaning Access. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 15(2), 411-427. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691619885860

Rodd, J. M., Gaskell, G., & Marslen-Wilson, W. (2002). Making Sense of Semantic Ambiguity: Semantic Competition in Lexical Access. Journal of Memory and Language, 46(2), 245–266. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.2001.2810

Rodd, J. M., Gaskell, G., & Marslen-Wilson, W. (2004). Modelling the effects of semantic ambiguity in word recognition. Cognitive Science, 28(1), 89–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsci.2003.08.002

RMS – Rečnik Matice Srpske. (1967 – 1976). Rečnik srpskohrvatskoga književnog jezika, t. I-VI [Dictionary of Serbo-Croatian literary language]. Matica Srpska.

Schad, D. J., Vasishth, S., Hohenstein, S., & Kliegl, R. (2020). How to capitalize on a priori contrasts in linear (mixed) models: A tutorial. Journal of Memory and Language, 110, 104038. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2019.104038

Tafra, B. (1986). Razgraničavanje homonimije i polisemije (leksikološki i leksikografski problem) [Distinguishing between homonymy and polysemy (lexicological and lexicographic problem)]. Filologija, 14, 381-393.

Wickham, H. (2016). ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. Springer-Verlag New York. https://ggplot2.tidyverse.org




DOI: https://doi.org/10.22190/TEME210418030M

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


© University of Niš, Serbia
Creative Commons licence CC BY-NC-ND
Print ISSN: 0353-7919
Online ISSN: 1820-7804